Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Fox
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ian Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable independent sources. I'm something of an organ buff and I can't find anything other than namechecks. Guy (help!) 07:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROF. My understanding of organists is that they need to be lead/head organist at a major church, cathedral, or university chapel to be notable. Bearian (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 01:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 01:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet academic notability. Assistant organists are normally not notable, with a few rare exceptions when they still get huge coverage (The assistant organists of the Tabernacle Choir at Temple Square are probably notable, but that is a widely broadcast position).John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of notable secondary coverage or independent sources Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.