Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabaneeta Dev Sen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn following sourcing by Jbtscott -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nabaneeta Dev Sen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. The only source of information given is on her own website. I was unable to find significant coverage at independent reliable sources using any of the three spellings/transliterations of her name (I could find her books and extracts of her books in different publications, but nothing biographical about her). No verification of the information in the article -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawing nomination following sourcing by Jbtscott -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Commentkeep Here is something [1] in fact quite a lot about her publications. I think there is little doubt that she is a very notable author, I will look for more but that reference may be enough to keep on its own. Okay found it [2]. Jbtscott (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good sourcing! I'd missed the ToI one completely (not sure why) - if the details can be added to the article/cited that'd be great (I'll do it myself if I have the chance to later today). I'm withdrawing my nomination and closing this, as no other opinions have been needed! Thank you, Jbtscott -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.