Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin C. Berry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to These Girls. MBisanz talk 01:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Colin C. Berry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't see how this actor meets WP:BIO. Additional input would be appreciated. Thanks, brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to These Girls; role in that movie is the only claim even approaching encyclopedic notability. Redirects are cheap. Baileypalblue (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I'd be okay with deleting, but I guess a redirect serves a purpose and preserves the history in case notable achievements are done in the future. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: he's a legitimate actor with acting credits in films and has upcoming projects. The article has references and has a decent amount of content within it. I see no reason in deleting it. musimax. (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- None of them are independent, reliable sources and he fails WP:ENTERTAINER: only one (at most) significant role in a notable film. Baileypalblue (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, I'm not seeing much about this guy in terms of sources. Tavix (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect While there clearly isn't enough content for a separate article, I can see the use of pointing people to his only notable work with a redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 10:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.